[Risk of thrombosis recurrence among patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated venous thromboembolism]. / Riesgo de recurrencia de la trombosis en pacientes con tromboembolia venosa asociada a COVID-19 y a cirugía.

Introduction: Recent surgery is a well-known major transient risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to the low risk of VTE recurrence after anticoagulation is discontinued. On the other hand, the risk of VTE recurrence among patients with COVID-19-associated VTE is unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of VTE recurrence between patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated VTE. Methods: A prospective observational single-center study was performed including consecutive patients diagnosed with VTE in a tertiary hospital from January 2020 to May 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were assessed. The incidence of VTE recurrence, bleeding, and death was compared between both groups. Results: A total of 344 patients were included in the study: 111 patients with surgery-associated VTE and 233 patients with COVID-19-associated VTE. Patients with COVID-19-associated VTE were more frequently men (65.7% vs 48.6%, p = 0.003). VTE recurrence was 3% among COVID-19 patients and 5.4% among surgical patients, with no significant differences (p = 0.364). The incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 1.25 per 1000 person-months in COVID-19 patients and 2.29 person-months in surgical patients, without significant differences (p = 0.29). In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 was associated with higher mortality (HR 2.34; 95% CI 1.19-4.58), but not with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.17-1.61). No differences were found in recurrence in the multivariate competing risk analysis (SHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.40 - 2.05). Conclusions: In patients with COVID-19 and surgery-associated VTE, the risk of recurrence was low, with no differences between both groups.

Riesgo de recurrencia de la trombosis en pacientes con tromboembolia venosa asociada a COVID-19 y a cirugía Risk of thrombosis recurrence among patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated venous thromboembolism

Introducción La cirugía reciente es un factor de riesgo transitorio mayor y conocido de tromboembolia venosa (TEV) debido al bajo riesgo de recurrencia de la TEV una vez suspendida la anticoagulación. Por otro lado, se desconoce el riesgo de recurrencia de la TEV en los pacientes con TEV asociada a COVID-19. El objetivo de este estudio consistió en comparar el riesgo de recurrencia de la TEV entre pacientes con TEV asociada a COVID-19 y a cirugía. Métodos Se realizó un estudio prospectivo, observacional y unicéntrico en el que participaron pacientes consecutivos diagnosticados de TEV en un hospital terciario entre enero de 2020 y mayo de 2022 y que fueron objeto de seguimiento durante un mínimo de 90 días. Se evaluaron las características iniciales, el cuadro clínico y los resultados clínicos. Se compararon las incidencias de recurrencia de la TEV, hemorragias y muertes entre ambos grupos. Resultados En el estudio se incluyó a un total de 344 pacientes: 111 con TEV asociada a cirugía y 233 con TEV asociada a COVID-19. Entre los pacientes con TEV asociada a COVID-19 hubo una mayor frecuencia de varones (65,7 vs. 48,6%, p = 0,003). La recurrencia de la TEV fue de 3% en los pacientes con COVID-19 y de 5,4% en los pacientes quirúrgicos, sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,364). La tasa de incidencia de TEV recurrente fue de 1,25 y 2,29 por 1.000 personas-meses en los pacientes con COVID-19 y quirúrgicos, respectivamente, sin diferencias significativas (p = 0,29). En el análisis multifactorial, la COVID-19 se asoció a una mayor mortalidad (HR = 2,34;IC 95%, 1,19-4,58), pero no a un mayor riesgo de recurrencia (HR = 0,52;IC 95%, 0,17-1,61). En el análisis multifactorial de riesgos competitivos no se observaron diferencias en cuanto a recurrencias (SHR = 0,82;IC 95%, 0,40-2,05). Conclusiones El riesgo de recurrencia fue bajo en los pacientes con TEV asociada a COVID-19 y a cirugía, sin diferencias entre ambos grupos.

Risk of thrombosis recurrence among patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated venous thromboembolism Riesgo de recurrencia de trombosis entre pacientes con COVID-19 y tromboembolismo venoso asociado a cirugía

Introduction Recent surgery is a well-known major transient risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to the low risk of VTE recurrence after anticoagulation is discontinued. On the other hand, the risk of VTE recurrence among patients with COVID-19-associated VTE is unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of VTE recurrence between patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated VTE. Methods A prospective observational single-center study was performed including consecutive patients diagnosed with VTE in a tertiary hospital from January 2020 to May 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were assessed. The incidence of VTE recurrence, bleeding, and death was compared between both groups. Results A total of 344 patients were included in the study: 111 patients with surgery-associated VTE and 233 patients with COVID-19-associated VTE. Patients with COVID-19-associated VTE were more frequently men (65.7% vs 48.6%, p =  0.003). VTE recurrence was 3% among COVID-19 patients and 5.4% among surgical patients, with no significant differences (p =  0.364). The incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 1.25 per 1000 person-months in COVID-19 patients and 2.29 person-months in surgical patients, without significant differences (p =  0.29). In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 was associated with higher mortality (HR 2.34;95% CI 1.19–4.58), but not with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 0.52;95% CI 0.17–1.61). No differences were found in recurrence in the multivariate competing risk analysis (SHR 0.82;95% CI 0.40–2.05). Conclusions In patients with COVID-19 and surgery-associated VTE, the risk of recurrence was low, with no differences between both groups.

Risk of thrombosis recurrence among patients with COVID-19 and surgery-associated venous thromboembolism.

INTRODUCTION: Recent surgery is a well-known major transient risk factor for venous thromboembolism (VTE) due to the low risk of VTE recurrence after anticoagulation is discontinued. On the other hand, the risk of VTE recurrence among patients with COVID-19-associated VTE is unknown. This study aimed to compare the risk of VTE recurrence between patients with COVID-19- and surgery-associated VTE. METHODS: A prospective observational single-center study was performed including consecutive patients diagnosed with VTE in a tertiary hospital from January 2020 to May 2022 and followed up for at least 90 days. Baseline characteristics, clinical presentation, and outcomes were assessed. The incidence of VTE recurrence, bleeding, and death was compared between both groups. RESULTS: A total of 344 patients were included in the study: 111 patients with surgery-associated VTE and 233 patients with COVID-19-associated VTE. Patients with COVID-19-associated VTE were more frequently men (65.7% vs 48.6%, p =  0.003). VTE recurrence was 3% among COVID-19 patients and 5.4% among surgical patients, with no significant differences (p =  0.364). The incidence rate of recurrent VTE was 1.25 per 1000 person-months in COVID-19 patients and 2.29 person-months in surgical patients, without significant differences (p =  0.29). In the multivariate analysis, COVID-19 was associated with higher mortality (HR 2.34; 95% CI 1.19-4.58), but not with a higher risk of recurrence (HR 0.52; 95% CI 0.17-1.61). No differences were found in recurrence in the multivariate competing risk analysis (SHR 0.82; 95% CI 0.40-2.05). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with COVID-19 and surgery-associated VTE, the risk of recurrence was low, with no differences between both groups.

Optimal thromboprophylaxis and anticoagulant strategies in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia. The PROTHROMCOVID Trial

Introduction: Hospitalized patients with COVID-19 are at increased risk of venous and arterial thrombosis, ARDS, and death. The optimal dosage of thromboprophylaxis in patients is unknown. Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of tinzaparin in prophylactic, intermediate and therapeutic doses in non-critical patients admitted for COVID-19 pneumonia.Design, Setting, and Participants: The PROTHROMCOVID multicenter randomized clinical trial enrolled noncritical hospitalized adult patients with COVID-19 pneumonia from February 1, 2021, to September 30, 2021, at 18 centers in Spain. Methods: Patients were randomized to prophylactic tinzaparin 4500IU or intermediate dose 100IU/kg or therapeutic tinzaparin 175IU/kg during hospitalization, followed by 7 days of prophylactic tinzaparin at discharge. The patients were stratified at the time of randomization according to age, sex and the presence or absence of hypertension.The primary efficacy outcome was a composite endpoint of symptomatic systemic thrombotic events, need for invasive or non invasive mechanical ventilation or not, including high-flow nasal cannula oxygen, or death within 30 days. The main safety outcome was major bleeding at 30 days. Data were collected and adjudicated locally by non-blinded investigators through imaging, laboratory, and health record data. Results: Of 311 patients randomized, 300 were included in the analysis (mean [SD]age, 56.7 [14.6] years;men, 182 [60.7%];women, 118 [39.3%]). 106 patients (35.33%) were assigned to the prophylaxis group, 91 patients (30.33%) were allocated to the intermediate dose group and 103 patients (34.33%) were randomized to the anticoagulant dose group. The composite endpoint thrombotic event, need for invasive (IMV) or noninvasive mechanical ventilation (NIV) or HFT via nasal cannula or death at 30 days from randomization occurred in 58 patients (19.3%) of the whole population, 19 patients (17.09%) in prophylactic group, 20 (21.98%) in intermediate group and 19 (18.45%) in therapeutic group (P=0.72). No major bleeding were reported in the trial and non-major bleeding occurred in 5 patients (4.71%) in prophilactic, in 3 patients (3.2%) in intermediate arm and in 3 patients (2.9%) in therapeutic, without significant differences in each group (P=0.31). Conclusions: In non-critically ill patients with COVID 19, intermediate or full-dose of tinzaparin do not appear to offer benefit over standard prophylactic doses IU in the likelihood of thrombotic event, non-invasive ventilation or high-flow oxygen, or death. Funding Acknowledgement: Type of funding sources: Private grant(s) and/or Sponsorship. Main funding source(s): Leo Pharma

Incidence of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels.

AIM: An increased risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE) in patients with COVID-19 pneumonia admitted to intensive care unit (ICU) has been reported. Whether COVID-19 increases the risk of VTE in non-ICU wards remains unknown. We aimed to evaluate the burden of asymptomatic deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in COVID-19 patients with elevated D-dimer levels. METHOD: In this prospective study consecutive patients hospitalized in non-intensive care units with diagnosis of COVID-19 pneumonia and D-dimer > 1000 ng/ml were screened for asymptomatic DVT with complete compression doppler ultrasound (CCUS). The study was approved by the Institutional Ethics Committee. RESULTS: The study comprised 156 patients (65.4% male). All but three patients received standard doses of thromboprophylaxis. Median days of hospitalization until CCUS was 9 (IQR 5-17). CCUS was positive for DVT in 23 patients (14.7%), of whom only one was proximal DVT. Seven patients (4.5%) had bilateral distal DVT. Patients with DVT had higher median D-dimer levels: 4527 (IQR 1925-9144) ng/ml vs 2050 (IQR 1428-3235) ng/ml; p < 0.001. D-dimer levels > 1570 ng/ml were associated with asymptomatic DVT (OR 9.1; CI 95% 1.1-70.1). D-dimer showed an acceptable discriminative capacity (area under the ROC curve 0.72, 95% CI 0.61-0.84). CONCLUSION: In patients admitted with COVID-19 pneumonia and elevated D-dimer levels, the incidence of asymptomatic DVT is similar to that described in other series. Higher cut-off levels for D-dimer might be necessary for the diagnosis of DVT in COVID-19 patients.